Languages And Dialects Codexery — Data & Quality

We publish our audit record because accuracy claims should be checkable. Every entry on this site runs through an automated fact-audit pipeline (accuracy audit → source-grounded repair → visual QA); this page is generated from that pipeline's own report, not written by hand.

Last full accuracy audit: 2026-08-28 · 5 entries checked · 3 flagged · 4 issues confirmed · 3 corrected · 1 still open

Recent findings (audit lane, verbatim)

Czech language — The first complete Bible translation is stated as the Dresden Bible, but the first complete Czech Bible translation is the Bible of Olomouc, completed around 1417, not the Dresden Bible.

Dutch language — The claim that Old High German's earliest attestations date from the 6th century is factually incorrect; the earliest known Old High German texts, such as the Abrogans, are from the 8th century.

Dutch language — The statement that Old Dutch influenced Old Saxon in the east is not a standard historical fact and is not widely accepted in canon.

Egyptian Arabic — The entry lists Muhammad Husayn Haykal's 'Zaynab' (1913) and Yahya Haqqi's 'Qindil Umm Hashim' (1944) as examples of Egyptian Arabic literature, but these works were written in Modern Standard Arabic or a form of literary Arabic, not in Egyptian Arabic.

Open data

All content is fetchable as JSON at /data/content/ · llms.txt · sitemap

Corrections

Spotted an error? Suggest an edit — reader reports go straight into the audit queue.

← back to Languages And Dialects